The DEFCON Warning System™

The World’s Only Public Nuclear Threat Advisory System. Independent, real-time analysis of global nuclear tensions. Since 1984.

DEFCON 5 Green

Strategic Threats Briefing – Aug. 11, 2025: Russia Ends INF Limits, Alaska Summit Planned

Condition: Green – DEFCON 5
Current Assessment: There are no imminent nuclear threats at this time.


Russia Ends Self-Imposed INF Treaty Restrictions

On August 4, Russia’s Foreign Ministry formally announced that the Russian Federation no longer considers itself bound by the self-imposed restrictions it had maintained under the now-defunct Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. These limitations, which Moscow continued to cite even after the treaty collapsed, were officially lifted in what the Kremlin described as a defensive response to U.S. and allied actions.

The decision effectively removes any constraints on where Russia can deploy intermediate-range missiles—including those capable of carrying nuclear warheads—within the range once prohibited by the INF Treaty: approximately 500 to 5,500 kilometers. This marks the end of any remaining ambiguity following the U.S. withdrawal from the treaty in 2019 and Russia’s earlier suspension of participation.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned that additional steps could follow, underscoring that this move forms part of a broader strategic policy rather than a one-time decision. Analysts note the timing—just days ahead of renewed U.S.–Russia diplomacy—suggests Moscow is leveraging the announcement to strengthen its negotiating position.

The implications are significant. Missiles deployed in western Russia, Belarus, or aboard naval platforms in the Baltic or Barents Seas would drastically reduce warning times for NATO capitals, complicating missile defense planning. In Asia, deployments in Russia’s Far East would tighten Japan’s and South Korea’s defense timelines, especially amid heightened North Korean activity.


U.S.–Russia Summit Scheduled in Alaska

The White House has confirmed plans for a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, August 15, in Alaska. The stated objective is to explore a path toward ending the Russia–Ukraine war.

Kyiv and European capitals are pressing for direct participation in the talks or, at minimum, to shape Washington’s negotiating stance before any proposals are put forward. President Trump has said he will advocate for a cease-fire framework and has floated controversial possibilities, including territorial arrangements. He has also indicated openness to including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in future discussions.

Over the weekend, reports suggested that a three-way meeting format remains under consideration, though no decision has been finalized. European leaders are actively coordinating their positions to ensure Ukraine’s sovereignty and interests are not sidelined in any bilateral discussions between Washington and Moscow.


Iran–IAEA Contact Without Inspections

In the Middle East, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is sending a senior official to Iran in an effort to stabilize a deteriorating inspection and verification relationship. According to Tehran, the discussions will be “technical” and “complicated,” with no inspections planned during this visit.

This marks the first high-level engagement since Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA following June’s conflict between Iran and Israel and subsequent allied strikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure. Without on-site access, the agency’s visibility into Iran’s nuclear activities remains sharply limited. Experts caution that even if enrichment work was disrupted, Iran could restore its capabilities within months.

Iran has made clear that any resumption of full cooperation will require approval from its Supreme National Security Council and alignment with domestic legislation—a negotiating approach aimed at securing concessions before restoring access.


Indo-Pacific Developments

In the Taiwan Strait, the People’s Liberation Army intensified its activity to mark the PLA anniversary. Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense reported 63 incursions into its air defense identification zone within a 24-hour period, including 38 that crossed the median line—continuing a pattern of surge operations intended to normalize higher levels of Chinese military presence in the area.

Meanwhile, North Korea has threatened “reprisals” ahead of the annual U.S.–Republic of Korea Ulchi Freedom Shield military exercises, set to begin on August 18. Pyongyang, which views the drills as a provocation, has historically paired such warnings with short-notice missile tests.


About The DEFCON Warning System

The DEFCON Warning System is a private intelligence organization that has monitored and assessed nuclear threats by national entities since 1984. It is not affiliated with any government agency and does not represent the official alert status of any military branch. The public should make independent evaluations and not rely solely on the DEFCON Warning System for strategic planning.

Citizens are encouraged to familiarize themselves with protective measures in the event of a nuclear attack. In the case of an actual nuclear event, the DEFCON Warning System will provide radiation readings from reported areas; official government sources will provide local readings.


For updates:
Visit www.defconwarningsystem.com for immediate information. Breaking news and important developments are also posted to the DEFCON Warning System community forum and the DEFCONWSAlerts feed on Twitter (note that Twitter updates may experience delays).
You can subscribe to the DEFCON Warning System mailing list for direct notifications.

Next scheduled update: 15:30 hours, August 18, 2025. Additional updates will be issued as warranted, with more frequent reporting at higher alert levels.

Ongoing Geointel and Analysis in the theater of nuclear war.

Opportunity

© 2025 The DEFCON Warning System. Established 1984.

The DEFCON Warning System is a private intelligence organization which has monitored and assessed nuclear threats by national entities since 1984. It is not affiliated with any government agency and does not represent the alert status of any military branch. The public should make their own evaluations and not rely on the DEFCON Warning System for any strategic planning. At all times, citizens are urged to learn what steps to take in the event of a nuclear attack.